Laman utama
AAV Today Response to Gram's Stains Comments
Response to Gram's Stains Comments
Alan M. FudgeHow much do you like this book?
What’s the quality of the file?
Download the book for quality assessment
What’s the quality of the downloaded files?
Jilid:
1
Bahasa:
english
Majalah:
AAV Today
DOI:
10.2307/27670215
Date:
April, 1987
File:
PDF, 243 KB
Tag Anda:
Memberitahu tentang masalah
This book has a different problem? Report it to us
Check Yes if
Check Yes if
Check Yes if
Check Yes if
you were able to open the file
the file contains a book (comics are also acceptable)
the content of the book is acceptable
Title, Author and Language of the file match the book description. Ignore other fields as they are secondary!
Check No if
Check No if
Check No if
Check No if
- the file is damaged
- the file is DRM protected
- the file is not a book (e.g. executable, xls, html, xml)
- the file is an article
- the file is a book excerpt
- the file is a magazine
- the file is a test blank
- the file is a spam
you believe the content of the book is unacceptable and should be blocked
Title, Author or Language of the file do not match the book description. Ignore other fields.
Are you sure the file is of bad quality? Report about it
Change your answer
Thanks for your participation!
Together we will make our library even better
Together we will make our library even better
Selama 1-5 menit file akan dikirim ke email Anda.
Selama 1-5 menit file akan dikirim ke kindle Anda.
Please note: you need to verify every book you want to send to your Kindle. Check your mailbox for the verification email from Amazon Kindle.
Please note: you need to verify every book you want to send to your Kindle. Check your mailbox for the verification email from Amazon Kindle.
Conversion to is in progress
Conversion to is failed
0 comments
Anda dapat meninggalkan komentar Anda tentang buku dan berbagi pengalaman Anda. Pembaca lain tertarik untuk mengetahui pendapat Anda tentang buku yang telah Anda baca. Terlepas Anda suka atau tidak buku itu, jika Anda menceritakan secara jujur dan mendetil, orang dapat menemukan buku baru buat diri mereka, buku yang sesuai dengan minatnya.
1
|
|
2
|
|
Association of Avian Veterinarians Response to Gram's Stains Comments Author(s): Alan M. Fudge Source: AAV Today, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Jan., 1987), p. 12 Published by: Association of Avian Veterinarians Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27670215 . Accessed: 18/06/2014 18:19 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. . Association of Avian Veterinarians is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to AAV Today. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 195.34.79.253 on Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:19:37 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 9*1 Mif ?x{i?Sue*tce,... to Gram's IME: Response Stains Comments With regard to IME's 697 and 698, I would agree that the Gram's stain is only a qualitative aid in assessing the microflora of lab, we small, the avian simply grade or moderate, three most The Gram's stains cultures are: negative large in number common reasons of 1) presence anaerobes; of Australians gram of the sample in the practice lab; 3) swabbing the pharynx a Gram's a sample submit then stain, For laboratory. are a better to screen place for a bird in fact the feather picking, when pharynx show may visual and of failure of the Gram's negative that shows few on organisms or no may Pseudomonas) Gram's without choose for flora to provide stain "diarrhea," any the choana assessment. over a I will always success improved with this approach as many practitioners have found when comparing separate cultures hanging around. not ?; Robert is California Remember, was the bird Wright, North Pole, to Reaction in Pigeons Vaccine Pox may are other for of pox. the prevention Leg feathers were plucked and the vaccine was brushed into the empty follicles as directed. Ten of the birds that the there an to normal. back IME: Adverse in the above that not came severe with down - clinical signs lethargy, off feed, and large lesions the around eyes and mouth. no deaths. One month non-viral were revaccinated and no morbidity with was were There later 24 birds the same vaccine noted. The vaccine was Vineland Pigeon Pox Vaccine of live virus chicken embryo origin. The vaccine is for use recommended observations. E. Schmidt, of Gatorade recommended not mean are amount small intranuclear inclusions a soda/water/chocolate seen intranuclear there A ?Annette Alaska as a prevention of pox in racing homer pigeons only. It DVM, PhD, may Veterinary Diagnostics, cause permanent lesions color change which would Inc. or exhibition show pigeons. or feather disqualify Vaccination should be administered only to healthy birds and can be done as early as 4 submitted from both ends of the same bird. I'm not really interested in what's passing through at the moment, but rather what's that the The owner of 60 young racing pigeons vaccinated all birds as and been of baking soda was water of warm and later administered and within hour, species and I believe does morphologic the cloaca/feces Clinical was other viral diseases that affect the feather follicle of psittacines (i.e., papovavirus), and guidance minutes. in a species. of 1 teaspoon to a quart the diseases which can cause grossly noted feather abnormalities, but the disease called psittacine beak and feather (or feather and beak) disease does occur in a variety of psittacine species based on on with pre-assessment This or media. Without disease crop," added regurgitate depend on the stage of the disease. stain, appear concerning a similiar have presence gram but has a hemogram that strongly suggests "bacterial infection"; twelve hours later, a heavy bacterial growth (e.g., of mentioned to stain the Gram's correct of inclusions indicate culture results might be in the Amazon parrot with an inflamed pharynx are intracytoplasmic perhaps olfactory changes (which often correlate A classic with abnormal flora.) example workers to place made and have dark diarrhea over the next 30 the Australian experience has been electron microscopic confirmation of the virus in a Ring necked parakeet (Psittacula) with identical histologie lesions. Both or disease respiratory In my were Attempts syringe was used to repeatedly flush out the crop. The bird continued to I have seen histologie lesions that are identical to those recently reported in cockatoos from Florida (JA VMA, 189, pg. 999) in several species including lovebirds and Eclectus parrots, and there bacteriologically. All too often, practitioners will submit fecal cultures (with no clinical changes in the stool) as a screen parrots. variety #3, the use of a sterile slide can eliminate the need for swabbing twice. Clinically, I do not agree that the feces viral-caused concerning occurrence to reswabbing to the Comments feather problems in a variety of psittacines. She specifically mentions lovebirds (Agapornis) and Eclectus with over 2) to Beak/ Disease cage. the bird back on the perch, but he continued to fall off. A few minutes later, the bird started regurgitating the chocolate and passing very dark stools. Using a home remedy for "sour Dr. Helga Gerlach has stated (IME 703) that she disagrees with the a decolorization for seen ingesting chocolate cake with chocolate icing. The bird became lethargic and later was noticed sitting with ruffled feathers on the bottom of the hood." IME: Objection Feather In our portals. an organism as to correlate fail under the type. morphologic "check always ?Alan M Fudge, DVM, Citrus Heights, California IME: Chocolate Toxicity During a birthday celebration, a 1 year old tame African Grey Parrot was weeks I of age. A vaccination "take" is determined by noting a swelling at the site of administration 10 to 14 days following the vaccination. If no "take" is 12 THE AVIAN PRACTITIONER This content downloaded from 195.34.79.253 on Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:19:37 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions